AI false report nearly led US to attack a Chinese cargo ship
so we just nearly started a war with china (a nuclear state) because of genAI use
CNN really downplays the seriousness of this incident in the headline, for whatever reason
wait, but am i reading here that if there WERE nuclear components on the Chinese ship, we *would* have boarded them?!
Remember when Elon/DOGE said firing all these federal workers with decades of expertise was no problem because we could replace them with AI? How'd that work out?
This is how AI will kill us?
fighting iran and china at the same time is a seagal movie.
You read something like this, and then think about the people currently in charge, and the full realization of how fucked we truly are suddenly hits you. We're basically wholly reliant on Stanislav Petrovs to save all our asses now--which is not a viable situation.
On one hand, AI might cause nuclear annihilation in the dumbest way possible. But on the other hand, it is semi-almost-useful at making lists. Gotta take the bad with the good!
The Dumb of All Fears
i see the chatbots have graduated from "you should kill yourself" to "you should kill everyone on the planet"
My understanding of AI, as a software engineer, is that a complicated statistical model won't suddenly get sentient and decide to kill us; but people who consider AI a magic authority will use it irresponsibly in high-stakes decisions, and those people *may* kill us
There’s a scene in Fail Safe where the POTUS sacrifices NYC as a make good for the accidental bombing of Moscow. I think Trump would be like, “why not take all of California too?”
It's wild that people in power are like "hey, let's put this global life and death decision in the hands of a black box that is infamous for making spectacular mistakes"
WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK. We're going to kill ourselves with AI long before it has the capability to kill us.
Turns out there is like one AI doomsday scenario that isn't completely far fetched but it's not one the AI companies seem to care about for some reason.
This is honestly the only way that AI is gonna wipe out humanity. By having humans put critical decisions to the stochastic parrot.
If AI actually ends the world it’s going to be because of boneheaded shit like this, not some tech bro fever dream
Lot of issues here but one part that sticks out in light of the almost-attacked-a-Chinese-ship story today: people with very important jobs where lives are at stake have bought the hype and outsourced their whole brains to AI. We're going to see more and more of this. www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...
That uncanny feeling when Sonnet 4.6 evaluates the core cognitive failure uncovered in both stories with more acuity than the dingbats at the Pentagon:
I love the sentence "it is not clear why they had such expectations"
yeah, this problem goes a lot deeper than just hegsgeth
Meanwhile just today Amazon’s chatbot didn’t know what day of the week or date it was in my interaction with it
Who are the AI goons infiltrating our military & our govt actually working for? Not us. A former senior US official familiar w/ military AI tools told the publication, “The internal tools are mostly just copies of the commercial stuff wearing lipstick” www.the-independent.com/news/world/a...
This ⬆️ is the biggest issue and you are absolutely correct. Everyone concerned about “AI is going to end the world“ aren’t wrong, but they’re worried about the wrong thing. If AI induces an extinction level of event, it’s going to be because of the failure of the people who create and use it.
it's really essential to underline that the use of failing or problematic software tools/AI tech IN NO WAY ABSOLVES THE ACTORS OF CRIMINAL CULPABILITY.
so much less worried about "what if claude goes rogue and hacks an bioweapons lab" than i am about "what if claude tells a one-star something wildly incorrect and he believes it and starts a war"
Makes me think of Stanislav Petrov, one of the greatest heroes in history. We're going to need to build systems that don't rely on people like him to stop a rush to judgment.
Much, much more. In Canada, as @ntusikov.bsky.social and I point out in a recent Policy Options piece, Mark Carney's foolish all-in bet on AI, combined with his civil service job cuts, is guaranteed to put lives at risk. People will die.
"it's not clear why they had such expectations," is such a delicious bit of criticism.
AI hallucinated a report that a Chinese ship was transporting nuclear material to Iran and the US military scrambled and nearly boarded it. We were apparently minutes away from a major war because of an AI hallucination. www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...
Great system we have here
Not the only time this Spring. On 7 April, Trump threatened to slaughter everyone in Iran. 4 hours later, a nuclear command jet took off from Andrews AFB and flew at a speed slow enough to trail a long-wire antenna to talk to ICBM bases and missile subs for almost 2 hours.
AI execs: That's okay, these are just teething problems, our models are getting better all the time, anyway give us more money /s
The raging lunatic ceo promised us they needed all that contracts for the US to win 21st century. Instead they’re profiteering, and killing school girls….the us missles are depleted in the middle east, chinese gps system are helping iran with their cheap drones…. so where’s investment $$
My fucking nervous system can’t take this shit 
Canada should train thousands of people on how to use this and push it into every public sector
Subscribe to @theflytrapmedia.com, we don't use AI and we won't start any wars.
Is this why they just banned CNN from the White House (not a thing you can do btw)
I want to be surprised. I am not surprised. This was absolutely foreseeable. That there wasn't a system of checks here to uncover this before we were nearly at war is a failure of leadership.
THIS IS INFURIATING. How stupid ARE THESE PEOPLE!!!!????
We almost started WW3 because a chatbot told us to. Iran + China + a proxy war with Russia in Ukraine = WW3. On top of that, the shitheel still wants to invade Greenland, which would trigger NATO's Article 5 against us. We are *so* close to the abyss, and the news won't cover it that way.
🚨 How is this not a bigger story? Seems pretty IMPORTANT to me…
I keep coming back to this story because the fact that no one is screaming from the rooftops about it in govt and immediately doubling down on AI regulations is mind-boggling
You guys ever win an argument three years after it happened?
i dont respect you if you use generative ai or support the military in any capacity. straight up
When the US bombed an Iranian school, killing over 100 kids, it involved over-reliance on an AI targeting system called "Maven," which based it on outdated information. I called it in @foreignpolicy.com in April Now confirmed in @bloomberg.com report of Pentagon investigation
An AI-generated intelligence report triggered preparations for a US operation, but it was caught before any war started. CNN’s exclusive says a chatbot wrongly flagged a Chinese ship as carrying nuclear weapons components during the Iran war. 🔄 www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...
Leading to jets deployed and boarding teams ready until officials realized the report was “entirely false” and stood the operation down. This is a perfect example how relying on AI in the military can start a war.
We have no cool heads at the Pentagon or White House to prevail. Better start praying for miracles.
When a toilet “decides” to run constantly, we have stop valves so we can turn the water off. When an electrical outlet “decides” to arc or pull too much power, we have breakers that trip. The fact that kill switches and safeguards for AI have been so willfully ignored by its developers is asinine.
"I'm sorry Dave.. I'm afraid I can't do that" Is Getting closer
AI was used in selecting the targets in Iran that resulted in the bombing of the girl's school & now could have possibly started a war with China. But don't worry everyone the not-so-stable dummy assured us that nothing bad can happen with the military rapidly adopting AI. #Blues #SheShed
You have to fact check everything that clueless POS spews out to/at you. If it claims water is wet, you'd better check that shit.
Then you have this headline:
As messed up as this is, we cannot use AI as an excuse to absolve the clowns responsible for uncritically using AI’s findings as a justification for more crimes. AI’s not issuing the commands, it’s not even passing the « intelligence » along.