Guardian: Saudi oil scientists worked on IPCC reports
How Saudi oil scientists ended up working on the world’s most important climate reports - Guardian investigation reveals fossil fuel links of IPCC authors, with experts declaring the body’s conflict of interest policy ‘not fit for purpose’ #climatecrisis www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Extraordinary 🤯 🤬 Thank you for this research @dpcarrington.bsky.social, @eoghangilmartin.bsky.social, @silvialazzaris.bsky.social, Rita Cruz, @simonguichard.bsky.social & David Haas 🙏
Because that is what big corporations do just like big tobacco
Google "IPCC scientist working for stripe" to understand how the claim that we avoided the worst case happened... #GrowYourRevenue
Captured institutions, largely ignored by AWOL security services. What the hell is going on? #Alberta #Britain #Germany #USA #Australia #France #NewZealand Enforce the law is not the extreme position. #Fartage #LePen #Wagenknecht #Smith #tRump etc. should all be behind bars for breaking the law.
This is just making me feel sick now.
some staggering quotes in this piece, including the claim by one IPCC scientist that sinply declaring funding from Saudi Aramco resolves any conflict of interest
JFC 🤯 "At least a dozen IPCC lead authors are employed by or linked to Saudi Aramco, Saudi institutions and other oil and gas interests [..] One IPCC vice-chair, part of the body’s leadership group, also represents the kingdom at global climate negotiations as a government employee."
Of the 223 lead authors in the IPCC working group III (mitigation of climate change), an investigation found 20 with strong conflict of interest concerns. "Authors’ conflict of interest declarations are not made public, & the conflict of interest committee provides no detail about its deliberation."
De rot kan overal zitten, en dus ook in het IPCC. Sterker nog: de krachten op dit orgaan zijn zo groot dat het van groot belang is het IPCC kritisch te volgen - iets wat veel te weinig gebeurt Hoera voor dit onderzoek 👇
Questions raised by this @theguardian.com investigation into @ipcc.bsky.social go right up to #ProfJimSkea "IPCC said there was no process currently under way to amend its conflict of interest policy" That needs to change, Jim, fast @ciel.org @georgemonbiot.bsky.social @rupertread.bsky.social
CoI is subjective but I do agree that this is not s good look for the IPCC.
FIFA sponsor Saudi Aramco. Breaking the Saudi oil ties should be a priority for any new FIFA boss.
Totally unfair. Why no Gazprom experts on IPCC?
Our investigation on the IPCC’s conflict of interest policy is out
This is the most extraordinary controversy in the history of climate science. An indictment of the IPCC’s culture and systems. I hope this team looks at the anthropocene vote next.
THIS is why the COP process has long been completely unfit for purpose, and why IPCC report findings must be considered very carefully indeed www.theguardian.com/environment/...
The Arsonist Fire Brigade!! Five so-called independent scientists all share the Saudi energy minister as their board chairman. Nothing screams rigorous academic independence quite like having the world’s biggest carbon emitter proofread the planetary autopsy. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Appointing oil executives to write climate mitigation policies is like hiring an arsonist to write the fire code and then praising him for recommending extra kindling.
Saudi climate diplomacy has pivoted from "climate change isn't real" to "carbon capture will miraculously fix everything, so please keep burning barrel after barrel."
This should surprise no one. Big Oil knew since 1954 about the effects of climate change. Shame on the paid-for "scientists."