Mark Zuckerberg planned to replace thousands of Meta staff with AI, plan collapsed

Earlier this year, Meta planned for AI to take over much of the daily work performed by thousands of human employees, and executives explored slashing the size of many teams by as much as 60%. But just hours before the first layoff wave, the CEO blinked reut.rs/3UkZ26n

Is that bad AI, make up, both on mark Zuckerberg?

Other companies will soon learn that, for many things, we still need a human in the loop. "Mark Zuckerberg had a bold plan to replace Meta staff with AI. Here’s how it imploded." www.reuters.com/investigatio...

Investigation: Meta explored slashing many teams by ~60% to become "AI native", but pulled back after staff revolted and data showed AI agents were ineffective (Katie Paul/Reuters) Main Link | Techmeme Permalink

suckerberg wanted to replace 60% of META's staff with A.I.; given that this corporation fails to show it's social use and mostly is at the center of political scandals, kids harm, fascistic abuses worldwide, etc. I'd recommend to shutdown them. burn them to the ground (the buildings, ok?).

‘Behold, Meta’s New AI,’ Says Mark Zuckerberg Covering Nipples In Tinfoil — theonion.com/behold-metas...

So far the loudest people on AI have been the billionaires. What's missing is someone fighting back and making sure WE the people write the rules, not Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg. We're urgently trying to reach 1 million people before September -- join me? stoptheracetoreplace.org/en/sign/just...

"Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is positioning himself as a positive voice on AI"... cut to a year from now when all data center construction is banned nationwide in perpetuity and existing ones are burned. www.politico.com/news/2026/08...

Meta's Project OT plan to replace thousands of employees with AI agents collapsed after internal revolt and weak productivity gains.

Full article on Reuters: www.reuters.com/investigatio... I asked two months back: why is Meta seemingly deliberately destroying its engineering organization? This is why. My analysis, back then: newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/why-is-met...

#Meta: "unchecked #AI agents were performing 'large-scale, disruptive actions that humans are unlikely to execute.' The result: Major technical and security incidents, such as service disruptions and possible data leaks..." www.reuters.com/investigatio...

"Internally, high-level Meta executives hunkered down. They opted not to discuss the article with the rank-and-file and quietly dismissed it to senior managers, instructing them to tell their teams they should expect roles to 𝘦𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘦 as a result of AI."

#Satire #Humor #AI Although conceding he obviously uses AI himself, Zuckerberg said all of the thoughts in the essay were his own. “AI is merely tool – it doesn’t replace original thought If you like I can also make it punchier and more engaging”.

1,300 lab employees asked Washington to help slow AI down. OpenAI delayed Astra voluntarily. Mark Zuckerberg didn't sign. The proposed fix is international inspectors, which is precise about what they'd see and silent on who they are or what they'd be paid lnkd.in/p/ehj8wtAh

He looks like a failed prototype of Mark Zuckerberg. But the AI thing is also equally apt.