Experts rank 30 ideas to fix U.S. schools
Shot: "We asked 37 top academics and researchers who study education to rate a range of ideas for both effectiveness and cost, on a scale of 1 to 7." Chaser: "The panel included: Dominique Baker..." LOL y'all I read so many papers to complete this survey on k12 www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/u...
🙋♀️ Fellow homework-doer and "panelist" here
Fascinating! Some things (like high quality curriculum) are less straightforward than others, but overall a really good set of priorities. (Also wonder if something related to food ever made it into consideration)
So excited once I saw your name!
I have questions: How different is "small group tutoring," from "smaller class size"? Are the small group tutors teachers or something else? Is it only more cost effective (not a measure I'm fond of) because the tutors are paid less than teachers? How small is a small group?
Okay, my tweet on this was snarky about inter-rater agreement and criterion validity re judgements but now I know you're one of the experts my trust is increased.
As someone with no expertise in this I am delighted to see many of my priors confirmed, including "private school vouches are expensive dogshit" and "banning cellphones is not a panacea." 🙏
Fascinating Two things I'm (someone w zero expertise in ed research) surprised aren't more effective according to the panel: - improving HVAC (thus: air pollution & CO2, temperature control, *and* respiratory viruses leading to absences--3 mechanisms I'd expect to all matter) - teacher coaching
"Require full books" is ranked 25th out of 30 here, only a few above "Private school vouchers" and "Allow A.I. use." The explanation? "Some experts saw this as common sense, though there is little existing research."
Great reply threads here. (Professor Baker stuck around after class to answer questions.)
I really wish this was broken down by which people recommended which things, because this list is a real mix of people I follow/respect (as the post quoted) and people whose recommendations I would see as proof positive I should oppose a thing…
New @nytimes.com piece ranks 30 education interventions on both effectiveness & costs. For me, the key takeaway is NOT about what academics (including myself) rated as most effective or least costly. It is about the decision making process districts use. 🧵 www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/u...
I don't disagree. But, as I wrote back to these reporters, I am most optimistic about projects that respond to the expressed concerns of students and teachers. These are the people who spend 180 days inside schools each year, and they're the key actors in the process of teaching and learning. 1/n
Vouchers aren't about effective education they're just another step in the long running effort to dismantle public education vote no on 3
“30 Ideas for Raising Standardized Test Scores As Cheaply As Possible” Fixed the title.
School voucher haters stand up
“It’s really obvious, so why do we not do it!" www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/u...
One of the things we don't have is a robust body of research evidence about reading whole books (due to a combination of things). I would bet, if we had research papers on this, reading books would have been rated higher.
So much discourse around academia is determined to actively ignore the actual material conditions of academia
Did anyone ask the experts if teachers are experts? Need to know if I know anything www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/u...
I'm increasingly convinced that having these conversations about national K-12 and not about smaller age cohorts and regions is a total waste of time
To be fair though, we mostly aren’t. We might know what works in our content area and classroom, or our building, but state or national level policy tradeoffs and cost estimation are a different matter entirely.
This is a stupid list.