Private Peter Thiel viewing of the Bayeux Tapestry alarms museum staff
John Redwood here - still smarting from an invasion that took place... NINE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS ago
John, John for Christ's sake John...
Never too late to claim one’s victimhood, Otto!
For god's sake don't tell him about the Romans
He was in government with Richard Drax and Edward Leigh. Just pointing out that if you want to meet the modern descendants of the Normans, the Tory Part is the optimum place.
I bet he has Norman ancestry. Like the rest of us.
For him the grief is still too near. The irony is the vast majority of the UK is owned by the direct descendants of William the Conquerors pals. His leadership group are the nobility John Redwood cosies up to.
To quote a French friend, 'If we hadn't liberated you in 1066, you'd all still be speaking German.'
This can't be real. This can't be real. It's real, isn't it?
I *really* like the historically accurate but clearly condescending use of 'Embroidery' here
Sounds terrible, imagine someone doing that to your country?
Quote post this to give your historian followers conniptions
So Jon Redwood thinks 1000’s of French soldiers killed in The Hundred Years War, when England invaded France died vey happily skewered on pikes & lances, slashed to death by swords, shot by arrows or murdered in cold blood afterwards as they were peasants and worth nothing.. Ohh how they laughed🙄
I make the same point as previously - that the descendants of Normans became today's establishment. There's a lot wrong with the UK establishment but it is not the big brother type described by paranoid amd deluded types like Redwood and Farage.
Among the many absurdities, Redwood wrongly calls it the Bayeux Embroidery - a great example of a pedant being completely wrong. It's an embroidery but its called the Bayeux Tapestry.
*The countries of the former British empire enter the conversation*
He remembers it like it happened yesterday.
we have expanded the museum's forward plan. our newly-added goal is simple and achievable: - absorb the British Museum into our museum so that we can technically display the Bayeux Tapestry by osmosis
it's going to be the post-Norman Norman Conquest of the British Museum
This would create An Absolute Unit of a Museum.
There are even scenes from rural life on the Bayeux Tapestry. It would fit right into your portfolio!
I cannot see any flaws to this plan…
Sounds a fab plan. Don’t forget the biscuits for distracting the director. Mmm wait was it Feathers Mcgraw idea?
The Reading Museum is closer and has *a* Bayeux Tapestry.
I'd watch this museum based heist movie.
Ambitious and expansion-orientated museum strategy. 👍 (If you add the British Museum to the collections, does it get its own specimen ID?)
Please let this headline happen, British museum MERL newest acquisition.
The Bayeux Tapestry demonstrates that it's worth embroidering a good story.
You had me in stitches.
Possibly. But I've lost the thread.
Pricked my sense of humour.
more to the needlepoint, it shows that a well thought thread can be a money-spinner....
Surely there's a whole thread in this subject matter.
Finding a good joke about the Bayeux Tapestry is like trying to find a needle in a Hastings.
Having the #BayeuxTapestry in the UK just now is exciting but DID YOU KNOW that in the #Orkney Archive we have our very own tapestry which tells the story of St Magnus? It's not as old/long/historically significant as the Bayeux Tapestry but it's still well worth a visit. 🪡
The British Museum should borrow it for a bit after the Bayeux Tapistry goes home. It'll save having an empty tapistry display case laying around.
Yeah but all they’ve got is the occasional arrow in an eye. You’ve got skulls being split wide open. Have they got skulls being split wide open? I don’t think so… (actually they probably have)
Peter Thiel didn't come to the UK to look at the Bayeux "tapestry", I'm sure. Why was he here? And who gave him the special favour of a secret, private viewing? And who else was with him? #R4Today
And why did he get to see it before the official unveiling and the King’s viewing? Who decided he was more important than the Head of State
I do hope the British Museum are not getting into bed with Palantir to surveil its visitors.
I cannot help but wonder why we heard this week that the NHS will not be getting rid of Palantir. Our personal health data will continue to be harvested.
Thiel is quite high on my list of suspects for why the nice Mr Burnham is standing aside while trans people are quietly being surgically removed from society in the UK, among other horrors.
How much if anything did he offer Osborne’s British museum? Who else was with him?
Maybe George Osborne by any chance ?
I saw the Bayeux Tapestry in 2007, bet they've added loads to it since then x
I bet this section is absolutely beautiful x
For Brexit, I bet someone just did a poo on it.
huh. i expected this to be a thread
I saw it in 2008 and it was up to date - had Karen Matthews' arrest on it.
I saw it way back in when it was just the Bayeux Teatowel
Bayeaux Tapestry sequel - 2 Bayeux 2 Tapestry
More evidence here that the far right takes academia very seriously, and puts considerable effort into buying its influence: "Vaughan’s [chief of staff at Thiel Capital] broad aim was to build a network of conservative influence at Cambridge and other elite universities"
Also conspicuous in the avowed goal of the McDonald Agape Foundation (Lord Biggar's big funder at Oxford) of 'planting' the 'footprint of Christ' in elite British universities.
Exactly like the Russians did in the inter-war years. Conservatives must now be regarded as spies for an external agency fighting to control you, as traitors to your country, and treated accordingly.
Finally, we don’t actually know who MADE the bayeux tapestry! The French maintain it was their court ladies; this seems unlikely based on materials and technique; the strongest theory currently is English nuns but look at the size of it. Not a small group.
Anyway the one thing we know for absolute certain? Like, the ONE (1) thing? It’s not a tapestry. It’s not woven. It’s an embroidery. Go forth and become insufferable with that tidbit.
the book Femina from Janina Ramirez talks about it in one chapter, and how it was distributed (?) in sections to embroider, then sewn up, and iirc each section was probably done by multiple women? like it is a LOT (also, I loved that chapter)
Brits scoffing at each other for the mispronuncing Bayeux forgetting that the word Paris exists.
It's an embroidery, not a tapestry
And that nobody spoke either English or French at the time it was made.
What is the history of the English (and maybe others ???) making up English names for foreign cities and countries? What is the point?
I'm reminded of Chaucer's Prioress: And Frenssh she spak ful faire and fetisly; After the scole of Stratford atte Bowe, For Frenssh of Parys was to hire unknowe.
Can't get used to jearing it referred to as "Bayoo" though. Where did that come from? Mind you, I'm not keen on the Templars being referred to as Templaars (and that's English!)🤣🤣🤣
Oddly, I would say that I was travelling to Paris to watch 'Paree Roobay' bike race.