Was Pluto’s 2006 demotion a mistake?
What really annoys me is that people are always talking about whether Pluto deserves to be a planet while ignoring all the other dwarf planets. It would only be valid for Pluto to be considered a planet if the same status was granted for all the dwarf planets, and they really don't want that.
When I was younger, I had sympathy for people who were sentimental about Pluto. It's been twenty years, and there are so many more dwarf planets. These days, I regard those people as potentially dangerous reactionaries. It's a sign of other things they were wrong about that they refuse to let go.
As someone who in 2nd grade excitedly listed the 13 planets with Pluto, Eris, Haumea, Makemake & Sedna: this, so much. And unlike the asteroids and Ceres' roundness, there's not anything uniquely planety about Pluto among its neighbours: it looks cool, but our sample size of visited round KBOs is 1