Seven charged over vandalism at Trump’s Turnberry, accused of 'terrorist connection'
I know this isn't terrorism. You know this isn't terrorism. The authorities know this isn't terrorism. But, once again, they have labelled protesters "terrorists", as part of the long-running programme to ensure that no one dares protest about anything any more. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
What this reflects is the growing power of the ultra-rich over every aspect of life. Protest is an affront to the power of wealth. So is any politics to the left of an ever-shifting "centrism". So is independent journalism. So are independent universities. One by one, they must all be shut down.
The word "terrorist" has been thoroughly devalued. I hope we never see real terrorists on the streets of the UK again but if we do I know we are less psychologicaly prepared because of all this nonsense.
They should be given medals for what they did, the UK is turning into a very strange and unrecognisable place. This was a simple protest, yes charge with damage, that's appropriate, but they are not terrorists, it makes the state look stupid but also dangerous.
I think that it would be hard to find people who didn’t agree with these terrorists let alone any who were terrorised by them.
And yet they don't label people kicking doors down, trying to lynch non-white people, and burn their houses as terrorists.
Maybe we should keep reminding those in power exactly what real terrorism looks like.
The expanded scope & overuse of the word "terrorism" is one of the stupidest lingering legacies of 9/11
…A vote for NZ National Party is a vote to extinguish your human rights. It’s not an isolated incident, it’s a nefarious global push to control the populous by those who fear accountability for their greed driven actions. #nzpol #OneTermGovernment #NZ #TaxTheRich #ForAllOfUs
The Trumpification of the UK continues apace. "Terrorism" has become a catch all term, to describe anyone who disagrees with and/or protests anything the Westminster government backs.
When you remove ordinary people’s ability to protest peacefully, you get riots. One might assume this is precisely what they’re aiming for.
i know british people aren't allowed to read anything that isn't a harry potter novel, and i weary of even saying anything, lest it be interpreted as advice or counsel or whatever, but: in life, if you are going to do something that will get you in trouble in any way, you should make it count.
Europeans talk a big game about how much the US has alienated them and how far their paths have diverged but on big domestic policy issues like policing and repression of speech they are very much following the US’s lead.
Ffs, we are not a territory of the USA or Israel and we need to stop acting as if we are. A bit less (a lot less) authoritarianism would be appreciated too.
Yes, we recognize the fascist playbook being imposed our struggling idiocracy…
@eddavey.libdems.org.uk @rhunapiorwerth.bsky.social @zackpolanski.bsky.social @johnswinney.bsky.social CON-LAB-Reform are all Corporatists sliding into fascism. The solution is for you all to work together and call it out before next GE. We need press changes, PR, rolling back of privatisation
This article is written very confusingly - what possible 'terrorist connection' could there be here? Unless it's PA they're referring to?
The legal definition of ‘terrorist’ in the UK has basically been destroyed now, hasn’t it? www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
They vandalised the grass on a golf course, FFS. Nobody experienced ‘terror’.
As someone who grew up with the IRA in the news, and who who had a job interview delayed because of the London Tube bombings, this does not sound like terrorism to me.
It's like being charged with GBH for ruffling someone's hair.
This is The Guardian, who have been treating the public like lobotomised frogs re transphobia for the last decade. Shifting the language to push an agenda is what they do.
It's nothing more than criminal damage, if i spray painted my neighbours car it wouldn't be terror related ,hmm wonder if it would if I spray painted my local politicians tho
Like someone else said I remember when our entire building shook, roof panels fell, and when the dust settled and we looked out, entire buildings next to us and a railway station had been destroyed by a lorry bomb. That felt a bit like terrorism.
A terrorist is now anyone pro-Palestinian who mildly inconveniences someone who matters
Seven people have been accused of a ‘terrorist connection’ and charged for damaging Trump’s golf course by painting ‘GAZA is not 4 sale’. Why are pro-Palestinian activists called ‘terrorists’, but Israel is not, when they are commiting genocide of the Palestinians. 🤷♀️
Terrorism law is that special body of law which provides for rights and obligations over and above the general law of the land. Terrorism law should be credible and taken seriously. The ever-expanding nature of ‘terrorism’ offences is not taking it seriously. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
Also I thought acts of terrorism should, y’know, inspire terror. Rather than a chuckle and a “good work, fellas” that this example did.
Could you explain the legal definition of "terrorism"? It seems to be invoked to counter what would otherwise be called criminal damage.
How do their actions on the golf course compare to the actions of some in Middlesbrough, which is also being called terrorism?
Surely inevitable that once you allow a higher set of laws, only accessible by the state, that wealth and power will do everything they can to bend it to their interests?
Blame Yvette Cooper - she cheapened the term in her determination to silence protest of UK Labour government complicity in genocide. Thin end of the wedge. Plenty more of this to come, she’s done the dirty work for Farage’s future.
I'm old. Glad not to have to witness too many more years of this horror.
The meaning of the word "terrorism" continues to get more blatantly ridiculous. Terrorist graffiti. Terrorist digging up of turf.
At some point this is going to end up with the Terrorism Act having to be amended because Labour Home Secretaries couldn't resist throwing a tantrum over Palestine Action
Funny that setting fire to buildings with immigrants in, attacking police and painting roundabouts isn't terrorism. What am I missing here 🤔
It's designed to crush the very idea of protesting. Helps to keep left-wing ideas in check too. This is Starmer's legacy.
Bad legislation is a fucker. Not that this definitional creep is anything new. Street art using water-soluble paint as criminal damage, almost any physical contact as assault etc. It doesn't do anything to boost confidence in the rationality of the legal system.
Another gulf renamed after Trump :-)
Terrorism now just means protesting against the rich and powerful.
I look forward to a Reform Home Secretary proscribing Labour as a terrorist organisation and Shabana Mahmood going on TV to say 'white liberals don't understand that we need to make tough choices, which is why I am now turning myself in to HMP Belmarsh'
Endommager un golf n'est pas du terrorisme, c'est même le devoir de tout citoyen. D'autant plus si c'est un golf Trump.
Except the people who terrorise asylum seekers. Those are "people with legitimate concerns about immigration" according to the government.
Meanwhile, in other quarters, a reluctance to call September 11 a terrorist attack. The T-word just seems to short circuit everybody's brain www.nationalreview.com/news/canadia...
Most importantly this is about the US using UK exaggerative proscription to extend their own limitations. Meanwhile the UK allows Tarrio to travel through the four regions unimpeded. Tarrio was charged with seditious conspiracy. (The Oath Keepers are not designed as a terror org in the US)
I wrote about just this back in 2014 noncuratlexeu.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/c... but also noting - forever - that none of the Jan6 accused were charged with terrorism offences. None of the perpetrators of the Belfast pogroms were charged with terrorism offences (despite proscribed orgs presence)
Deleted a previous post as it doesn't seem that 'serious damage to property' is the basis of the terrorism connection here. I'm actually not sure what it is - does anyone know for sure?
So if you dig up one of Trump's golf courses, you're a "terrorist" now. 🙄 "You are charged with terrorising the sod and committing violence against blades of grass." 👨⚖️
The charges were applied after a meeting between Eric Trump and John Swinney. Seems like maybe the SNP aren't quite the party of the left they normally like to portray themselves as.
If destroying landscapes is terrorism, Trump should be on the most wanted list. His wrecking ball stretches from the east wing of the White House to the reflecting pool to America's national monuments.
> It adds that it will be proved “that the aforesaid offence was aggravated by reason of having a terrorist connection”. < Ah... here comes the "Antifa" bullshite.
There isn't a jury in Scotland that would convict them. www.ipsos.com/en-uk/7-10-s...
Very apartheid South Africa like. They also designated ever act of countering the authority as terrorism.
We should ask ourselves why. The only reason I can think of is he's burying/storing top secret information at his golf courses.
Damaging a golf course is not terrorism. We've lost the plot in this country www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
This is how the police should react to anti-Trump signage at Turnberry
Feel like this might be self-fulfilling. Some people intent on some peaceful demonstration will be like "if I'm gonna get charged with terrorism anyway... might as well blow up the clubhouse".
Unfortunately the UK has seen terrorism all too close, this is doesn't look like that.
What this is communicating to the UK public, is that the government values property as high as human life. It also trivialises terrorism, which is incredibly rare in the UK.
Whatever you think of the wisdom of protestors disrupting a golf course by painting slogans it is not anyone's common sense definition of terrorism. These crazy over reactions to peaceful protest by the authorities undermine the real fight against terrorism. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
Seven people charged with vandalising Donald Trump’s Turnberry golf course in Scotland have been ludicrously accused of maliciously digging up turf “having a terrorist connection” www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...
Britain is a vassal state, and it's business as usual under Burnham. The UN released a report in Janary carried out by Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights & fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Ben Saul. This doesn't meet the UN criteria of terror. [1/2]
Worth saying that in Eng&Wales, the jury are unaware and the judge decides (post verdict), but in Scotland it is included in the charge & therefore the jury are aware. Prosecution needs at least 10-5 for a guilty verdict, anything less is not proven or not guilty (no hung juries, no retrials)
Pro-Palestinian Activists Accused of Vandalizing Trump Resort Face Terrorism Accusation Mr. Trump described them as “the terrorists who attacked the beautiful Turnberry” and said that “they did serious damage, and will hopefully be treated harshly.” www.nytimes.com/2026/08/28/w...
Well he got what he wanted - courtesy of our supine govt Did the US demand this aproach? Was it Israel? Or did our Labour offer it to curry favour?
Is the timing of Trump using his political powers to proscribe Palestine Action and this court case involving his private business interests another example of political corruption? Does Trump's invoice the US Secret service for staying there, therefore, treat the course as private when he visits?