Skip to content

The Assault On Science Funding Continues

scienceJul 24, 2026391,540

Science Magazine columnist Derek Lowe and other science organizations warn the White House is shifting academic research funding toward political allies and industry favorites. Lowe wrote that "the Trump administration hates academic science funding, full stop," and accused the administration of wanting to keep money to "hand out to favored cronies who can help them get elected." Critics point to Michael Kratsios's Office of Science and Technology Policy report "Science: A New Golden Age" and to an executive-order-created program called the Genesis Mission as mechanisms for reallocating grants to AI-focused initiatives and hyperscalers. Reporting and commentators say the shift would cut traditional peer-review processes and accountability, with one outlet claiming the administration plans to reassign as much as $200 billion from academia to politically chosen projects. The administration announced awards for a flagship AI program and faced Congressional hearings after the OSTP presentation to the Science Committee. Scientists and science organizations are framing the move as politicization and cronyism that would redirect long-standing federal research streams away from universities and basic science.

Mark Histed
@markhisted.org

I co-sign this great summary from @dereklowe.bsky.social . The goal is to destroy academic science, and these are the reasons. And all the “gold standard” and “needs reform” and “not high risk” stuff is transparent bullshit to hide the ball on what they are doing.

=
Science
science. But let me make something clear right up front. When I talk to people about this subject (and that includes some journalists as well) and say what I'm about to at the end of this paragaph I am sometimes met with disbelief. But I mean what I say and I am trying my best to say what I mean: The Trump administration hates academic science funding, full stop. They hate where that money goes, and they hate who it goes to. They want to keep all that money for themselves, to hand out to favored cronies who can help them get elected and to steer yet more money and more power back into their hands.
That's it. That's the story. They are naturally not putting it in those words, but instead talking about "gold standard science" and the
"reproducibility crisis" and funding "bold inquiry" for "transformational
breakthroughs". This is all bullshit, and it's important to realize that. Shameless hand-waving bullshit, delivered in a how-dare-vou-
35222h ago
Derek Lowe
@dereklowe.bsky.social

Thoughts on the various Trump administration proposals to revamp US science funding - and what they all have in common:

256Yesterday
Quoting this
Alex Wild183

This is a blunt assessment of what the Trump regime is proposing for US science: they plan to take all the funding, essentially collapsing university-based research, in order to give that money to themselves, and they are lying about it.

Chase Million25

By training and culture, scientists tend to assume that others are acting generally in good faith, not willfully lying, and share an interest in pursuit of truth for the good of humanity. This is easily exploited by hostile and bad faith actors. Sometimes the correct response is "Fuck you, liar."

Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽25

"Instead, it’s time for politics...This destruction will take place most easily in an atmosphere of worn-out apathy and helplessness, so give them the opposite. Make it hard for these people, because if they get their way it’s for sure that they want to make it very, very hard on you."

Alex Wild21

Another way to think of Trump's proposal is: He is taking public money from people who don't pay bribes, or don't have enough money to pay bribes, being middle class scientists, and dangling it front of the techbro billionaires, because they *do* pay bribes.

Brandon Bishop18

"administration hates academic science funding, full stop. They hate where that money goes, and they hate who it goes to. They want to keep all that money for themselves, to hand out to favored cronies who can help them get elected and to steer yet more money and more power back into their hands."

Dr. Paulette Vincent-Ruz16

Everything that is said here and LOUDER for people in the back. I freaking swear WE ARE NOT ACTING ANGRY ENOUGH. Like every fucking college president in the country and democtrat needs to start doing this now

betsythemuffin.bsky.social16

Another piece of the puzzle: These proposals are largely from people who couldn't hack lab sciences but could hack sophomoric Tumblr "rationalist" bullshit, and who need to convince themselves that they're "technical."

Philip Ball15

What Derek says. All of it. Forget all the chin-scratching analyses of the Trump administrations "proposals" & plans - it comes down to this. It's time we simply said it.

Boston Tom Levenson13

Read this. Lowe is exactly right. See below for the key fact to keep in mind whenever a member of the Trump administration opens his (almost always a his, not a hers) mouth about science funding. Federal spending on science is intolerable to them; in their minds, that cash belongs to them.

Brandon Bishop13

If your professional society leaders aren't talking like this, it's time to get new leaders.

1 source