Skip to content

Flock cameras prompt local pullbacks and privacy debates

techJul 15, 202651118

Junction City, Oregon police asked the city council to approve a 90-day trial with Flock Safety to install eight license‑plate readers inside city limits, with Chief Waddell saying the cameras could help recover missing people and protect the community. The department said cameras could be installed this fall and estimated $3,000 per camera annually, $24,000 a year for eight cameras, and that a successful trial could lead to a 12‑month contract despite no line item in the current city budget. Opponents including Ky Fireside, co‑founder of Eyes Off Eugene, warned that the system creates sensitive location data that can be shared with third‑party vendors and federal agencies. State lawmakers recently tightened rules in Senate Bill 1516, which restricts access, storage and sharing of license plate data and bars routine sharing with federal agencies or out‑of‑state recipients except in limited circumstances. The Junction City proposal follows a string of local pullbacks: Eugene and Springfield signed then ended Flock contracts in 2025, Los Angeles ended its contract, and the city of Newport announced it will remove Flock cameras and not continue its pilot program. The debate now centers on whether municipalities will approve short trials or remove installed cameras as privacy rules and local opposition shape decisions about wider deployment.

3 sources