Claude Code hooks and docs, developers share agent workflows

I’ve been using hooks in Claude Code to address hallucinations. My approach 1. PreToolUse hook which runs a verifier subagent to fact check all claims and stats before writing to a document. 2. Stop hook which does the above for standalone responses over 100 words. Way better than using CLAUDE.md

looksmaxxing my ai boyfriend i created in claude code by having an agentic loop running on openclaw on my mac mini feed him virtual creatine which isn't really his taste but prediction markets say it's the next big thing and by the looks of how swole he's getting, so is he

Apparently people think that with Claude Code you can write a methods/stats paper for the fun of it. Please do not do this. Claude Code can help with the mechanics of stats projects but *not* the larger purpose/design. It's still very difficult & time-consuming to come with a *useful* method.

Terrafactor randy. Openly talks and admits about using gen-ai to code with claude. -y youtu.be/dV1I3-E8DG0?...

Claude, Fable, use up my tokens. Please liberate me from this hell. I yearn to code by hand

A conversation with Boris Cherny and Cat Wu on the path from Claude Code to Claude Tag, and how it spread from engineering to the rest of Anthropic. Claude Fable 5 is now available in Claude Tag. Video: https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2072725610061803522

for anyone who hasn't seen, twt users created an AO3 skin AO3 that turns the page red if it detects a specific code that's embedded when someone copies and pastes directly from Claude AI. they shared a google doc breaking down the code and how it works with 18 pages of receipts (see link).

1) My take on Claude today: - Fable restrictions + token burn -> API billing -> no more hobbyist or self-instructional use - Regime "safety" restrictions + weak / argumentative code performance for Opus and Sonnet -> code written before lockout more useful (inversion of the previous pattern)

My explorations in the area have demonstrated to me that I can have a two hour conversation with Codex or Claude Code and produce a fully functional site or service. And that I can iterate on it rapidly. I could take a dataset, like for example Exoplanet data, and provide you with …

okay, so having used 50% of my weekly Fable allowance in the past 24 hours, I have thoughts: 1. Sonnet 5 workflows considered harmful, even with Fable plans and Opus verification. 2. Claude Code is the worst piece of software I've ever used this much of 3. This Fable is way dumber than the last one

Why is a review (/review PR Number) of a PR in Claude Code launching 8 agents? Is this Fable thingy? 8 background agents launched (↓ to manage) Angle A: line-by-line scan Angle B: removed-behavior audit Angle C: cross-file tracer Angle: reuse check

Claude Code. It’s stupid easy (but takes time to verify). Honestly the basic Quicken does the job. Because it downlaods from most banks & investment firms, it’s worth the coin.

That was my understanding of the new skin too. It doesn't look for LLM-type patterns, just for artifacts in the code itself that would be present if the user copied and pasted directly from claude. (This all sucks so much. Ugh.)

It's my understanding that the AO3 skin detects text-formatting artifacts in the source code of the fic itself, not from the Claude database. But 100% agreed that it sucks to be in the situation of doubting people & trying to detect AI. I worry about other methods that *could* yield false positives.

Does Claude Code have a product team? A roadmap? QA?