Skip to content

Study: deaths linked to London air pollution fell 40%

scienceJun 24, 2026171,088

Imperial College London analysis estimates deaths attributable to London air pollution fell about 40% between 2019 and 2024. The study finds nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations dropped 41% and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) fell 28%, and it links the improvements in part to the citywide Ultra Low Emission Zone and cleaner vehicle standards. At the same time, Imperial recalculated health risks and concluded air pollution contributes more to heart, lung, diabetes, and dementia deaths than earlier models estimated. That combination means the ULEZ and similar policies likely prevented a substantial number of premature deaths and that further pollution cuts could deliver measurable public-health and NHS benefits.

Mark Chadbourn
@chadbourn.bsky.social

All the Reform nutters opposed expanding the ULEZ because they don’t like change. It’s helped cut deaths from air pollution by 40%.

56345d ago
Raymond Bennett33

Hats off to Sadiq Khan who took a big political risk by standing up to shouty 'popular' opinion because he knew it was the right thing to do. This is what I want from all our political leaders?

Buck Frexit18

Yes but some of those saved lives might be brown, hence the problem.

BrianinFrance12

ReFUK: the party of death and destruction, when they are not being racist.

Ilikecaketoo (UK)9

The difference in the air quality walking round parts of major cities, particularly London, is tangible.

Steve O'Gorman 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿7

A 20mph limit in Welsh residential streets has produced similar results. NF supporters are portraying it as a 'blanket' limit for the country, which is crap. Drivers know this, but the far-right contingent deny the evidence of their senses and trot out the 'first step to communism' line every time.

BrianB4

But they DEMAND the right to let "other people" die !!

Elthampug 🇬🇧🇺🇦4

Cameras are still being damaged, mainly on the periphery like the Bexley/Dartford border. Had Johnson brought this in instead of Khan do you really think there would’ve been this much vitriol?

Kate Martin3

Excellent by Sadiq Khan. Such strength and leadership. Yet no one mentions Sadiq Khan as Labour leader.

Nonnie Ida2

I remember sitting with my two sisters in the back seat of the car with my two parents smoking up front — with the windows closed. This is what they want to go back to.

Richard Dubourg2

Actually it's because they don't like paying taxes and don't see why they should do anything to stop other people getting sick.

Mike D London2

I remember trying to point out how bad it was to their Mayoral candidate Howard Cox. He just blocked me instead, which seemed rather discourteous...

James2

Nah. It was because they thought they had a human right to drive huge Chelsea tractors down suburban streets at speeds they wanted and in the direction they wanted. Without any thought for other people.

1 source