How The Guardian picked its 100 best novels
The Guardian published "The 100 best novels of all time," a ranked list of the top 100 novels in English as voted by authors, critics and academics worldwide. The newspaper also ran an explainer naming WHO was invited to nominate and vote and outlining the nomination and voting process. The list mixes canonical classics with recent books to broaden the literary canon and to steer readers, reviewers and educators toward titles the organizers consider essential.
The Guardian list of the "100 greatest novels of all time" is certainly A list of 100 novels.
I hope that they have followed their usual “everything you like is shit” policy. It has served them well for Ranked! over the years 😀
What's so good about "The Catcher in the Rye"? I've never quite understood the frothing.
It is most definitely 100 novels. Did anyone born in the current century have anything to do with this list?
Worthy stuff, but a bit yawnsome.
I think that’s a fair assessment.
That Guardian book list. I've read one, 1984. Which tells you the kind of things I like to read. And design manuals.
Can't believe a man of your profession hasn't read The Road. I believe RBKC use it as their design standard for cycle lane provision
It seems to mainly be a list of books people like to say they've read.
7 of that lot I've read, and at least 3 of those were absolutely amazing, unforgettable.
Read seven on that list. I'm more of a non fiction reader.
Catch 22 and I think I've read 1984.
I’ve read more than expected, GCSE English and University related for about half of them